P: 416.369.4336
F: 905.845.8720

First Canadian Place
100 King Street West
Suite 5700
Toronto,  Ontario
M5X 1C7


For consults or appointments please contact Francis Robinson

Health Law Blog

This Little Patient Went to Market - The Case for Market-Based Health Care Policy

July 3, 2014

Is it possible that the “dismal science” might be the answer to the dismal state of health care delivery in Canada?

In 2012, Canadians waited, on average, 8.5 weeks from the time they received a GP referral until they met with a specialist; they then waited an additional 9.3 weeks (on average) from that meeting until treatment could begin. Apart from the personal consequences of lengthy waiting times, there are economic consequences as well ranging from potentially increased cost of care should an individual’s condition worsen due to a lengthy wait to overall reduced labour force participation. According to a study published by the Fraser Institute, in 2012, wait times in Canada cost Canadians as much as $3 billion in lost time and productivity.

One possible solution comes in the form of market-based health care policy and the tried-and-true concept of supply and demand. In terms of the Canadian health care system, this would mean giving Canadians the option of paying for health care with their own money, allowing doctors and hospitals to price their services without being restricted by government price controls, allowing for the purchase of private insurance for medically necessary health care, and allowing doctors and hospitals who are paid by the government to also provide medical care to private pay customers.

The benefits of such a policy and the increased competition that accompanies it are significant. Under a market-based approach, for example, an increase in demand means that more resources are drawn into the system rather than having to be rationed as they are now. In this case, everyone benefits. Wait times will also be reduced as those who can afford to pay for private care are removed from the public queue.

Market-based policy isn’t just good in theory. Several developed nations including Belgium, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Switzerland and the Netherlands have successfully managed to employ some form of choice that combines universal access to health care with a competitive market model. Citizens in these countries enjoy timely access to health care without the lengthy wait times we have here at home. A market-oriented model is well worth considering if Canadians hope to continuing benefitting from increasingly scarce health care resources.


Working with Tracey as closely as I have for the last 27 years, I am in a position to comment on her speaking expertise and why she would add considerable value to any lecture, presentation or seminar. I have not only heard her present, but I have also presented with her as co-presenter. Tracey is one of those rare individuals that can create buzz and excitement as soon as she walks in the room and starts to speak. In my opinion, that’s exactly what you want at a presentation: “buzz”. You want people excited and that’s what Tracey delivers. Her presentation style is dynamic and alive and is NOT just someone reading PowerPoint slides. Once any presentation is complete, a leading indicator of the presentation’s success is the number of questions and participation from the audience. In Tracey’s presentations, the audience is so engaged that the question and discussion period will likely need to be cut off.

Stephen R. Binder, B.A. , C.A. Partner, Grant Thornton LLP Personal and business accountant and advisor since 1985

Tracey Tremayne-Lloyd Health Law