P: 416.369.4336
F: 905.845.8720

First Canadian Place
100 King Street West
Suite 5700
Toronto,  Ontario
M5X 1C7


For consults or appointments please contact Francis Robinson

Health Law Blog

Public Hospital Act Changes - Medical Staff Muzzled in Delivery of Care to the Public

December 16, 2010

The recent amendments to the Public Hospitals Act – which were advocated by the management and administration of the Ontario Hospital Association and which the Ontario government embraced whole-heartedly and very rapidly this past year – have had the effect of removing the voice of the medical staff in every hospital by eliminating meaningful participation at the board level. The presence of the medical staff representatives without a vote makes them nothing more than mere observers at the board meetings of our hospitals.

What these changes do not do, however, is remove in any way the legal obligations of the medical leadership (the Medical Advisory Committees or “MAC”s) from responsibility and accountability for delivering safe, timely, and accessible patient care in their institutions.

Every chief in every department in every hospital must ensure that no by-law changes are enacted that would change the make-up or the voting process of their MACs. This is not required by any of the recent legislative changes; however, some hospitals have indicated an intention to change by-laws in order to accomplish such MAC make-up, chairpersonship, and voting.

Regardless of the justification put forward in any hospital, the medical leadership continues to carry the legal and ethical liability for the quality, standards, and timeliness of medical care. To accept the liability without the ability to oversee this onerous responsibility, or to recommend or require meaningful changes, resources, reviews and the like, is an exercise in self-destruction.

Hospitals are the mandatory workplace of our consultants and surgeons. They have a right to have a meaningful voice in their workplace environment and they have a duty to the public and themselves to be listened to in that environment. This right involves more than being simply seen, but not heard. This is particularly true in the functioning and management of the institution at the delivery-of-care level.


Working with Tracey as closely as I have for the last 27 years, I am in a position to comment on her speaking expertise and why she would add considerable value to any lecture, presentation or seminar. I have not only heard her present, but I have also presented with her as co-presenter. Tracey is one of those rare individuals that can create buzz and excitement as soon as she walks in the room and starts to speak. In my opinion, that’s exactly what you want at a presentation: “buzz”. You want people excited and that’s what Tracey delivers. Her presentation style is dynamic and alive and is NOT just someone reading PowerPoint slides. Once any presentation is complete, a leading indicator of the presentation’s success is the number of questions and participation from the audience. In Tracey’s presentations, the audience is so engaged that the question and discussion period will likely need to be cut off.

Stephen R. Binder, B.A. , C.A. Partner, Grant Thornton LLP Personal and business accountant and advisor since 1985

Tracey Tremayne-Lloyd Health Law